The dramatic winner of England against Italy would have been canceled if the radical plan is approved

The last winner of England against Italy would not have counted under a new potential rule which has been suggested.

The lionesses dragged 1-0 in the semi-finals and it seemed that the goal of Barbara Bonansea was to go and send the Azzurri to the final on Sunday.

But England launched everything and in the 96th minute, Michelle Agyemang appeared with another dramatic equalizer after her heroic against Sweden in the quarter -finals.

The 19 -year -old’s young woman’s strike has forced the additional time, who could not separate the two parties when the penalties were taking advantage of.

It was until Beth Mead was shot down by an in -depth extent inside the area with remaining minutes at the chronometer, allowing his arsenal teammate Chloe Kelly the possibility of sending England to the final with a kick of the 119th minute.

Kelly, the winner of England in the 2022 final in Wembley, intensified and interpreted his unique break, but Laura Giuliani guessed the right way and made the safeguard – only so that the ball bounced directly to the 27 -year -old youth who slipped home before riding in the euphoria.

UEFA’s position on IFAB’s radical penalty change

The laws in football evolve and change constantly – with a recent introduction by seeing a given corner kick for goalkeepers who hang on the ball too long.

But a recent change in the rule discussed involved penalty kicks, which means that a lessee like Kelly or teammates is not allowed to run for the rebound.

Once the goalkeeper saves the penalty, the sequence is over and the ball would be “dead” as in a shooting.

According to Martyn Ziegler of Time, Talks took place around the potential penalty roof, UEFA opposing it strongly.

After seeing Kelly find the net at the second moment of the request, the journalist went on X and wrote: “UEFA will also oppose the movements to change the rule on penalties so that if the goalkeeper saves the dead ball (such a change – supported by certain senior football figures – would have prevented Chloe Kelly from England from Chloe Kelly.”

In the published article, Ziegler said that if the suggestion was to grow to the point that IFAB football legislators had to consider the change, many trials through various competitions would probably be necessary above all verdict.

The feeling of those on board is that it would help eliminate the encroachment of other players, while they argue that receiving a 12 -meter clear shot is already a sufficiently large advantage.

“I have already mentioned this in discussions that we have had at IFAB,” said Pierluigi Collina, president of the FIFA arbitrator committee said.

“A solution is the” One Shot “rule. Just like in penalty shooting after an additional time.

“No rebound. Either mark or play for curriculum vitae with a goal kick, the final point.

The rebounds have been allowed on penalties for some time now, the only bonding point being a player does not get follow -up if the ball strikes the pole without a goalkeeper of the goalkeeper and returns.

England will face familiar enemies in the final, with Germany and Spain – both recent adversaries in large parts, in competition in the semi -finals on Wednesday.

(Tagstotranslate) England